Ha ha, the power of Burl, limited as it might be, compels
you to read this movie review! Yes, today I thought I’d talk about Exorcist III, a famously troubled
production that, in its intended version, contained neither an exorcism nor an
exorcist until some third-act tampering by its producers!
Now, I would have been just fine with that, and I’ve never
understood why it was such a sticking point with these producers that they
spent millions of dollars, incurred bad press, alienated their writer/director
and, not incidentally, badly compromised their movie, in order to celebrate
literal-mindedness by shoehorning these scenes in! They sit within the final
product about as comfortably as the hospital scenes do within Bad Meat, ha ha!
But much of Exorcist
III is gold! The movie takes place, as the dialogue often reminds us,
fifteen years after two key events: the Georgetown exorcism of the original
picture and subsequent stairway death of Father Karras; and the capture and
execution of the notorious Gemini Killer! Now some very Gemini Killer murders
have begun again, and grumpy, rumpled (grumpled?) cop Bill Kinderman, played by
the great Lee J. Cobb in the original, and by the great George C. Scott here,
finds his lack of faith sorely tested by the increasingly supernatural
goings-on!
Ha ha, for me the very heart of the picture is the
relationship between Kinderman and his pal, Father Dyer, played by the merry Ed
“’Salem’s Lot” Flanders! Their scenes
together have an appealing, if synthetic, jocularity, and are also very weird
and funny! Unfortunately, by the end of the first act Father Dyer has lived up to his name, and the movie suffers for his absence!
Like William Peter Blatty’s earlier directorial effort, The Ninth Configuration, this is an
unquestionably oddball picture, and that’s something else I like about it! It’s
alternately eccentric, beautiful, eerie and genuinely scary! (Brr, that famous
hospital shock scene!) Ha ha, by the second half of the movie, with long scenes
of dialogue between Kinderman and the serial killer played by Brad “Dune” Dourif, it becomes something
altogether more run-of-the-mill, and fits in nicely with all those other resurrected-killer
movies of the period, like The Horror Show, Shocker and The First Power!
The movie successfully weaves an atmosphere in which
anything might happen! There’s a dream sequence in which Fabio, Patrick Ewing
and Samuel L. “The Avengers” Jackson
all appear as angels, and another scene in which the great Viveca Lindfors,
known from Silent Madness and many
other pictures, tries to cut off a teenage girl’s head with some giant head
clippers! There are many gruesome details discussed in the dialogue, and if
ever there was a “tell, don’t show” gore movie, this is it! (Until the exorcism
scene that is, which gets fairly bloody after poor Father Morning, played by
Nicol “Black Widow” Williamson, gets
stuck to the ceiling for some reason!)
With its fascinating gallery of actors (all the
aforementioned, plus Scott “Blue City”
Wilson, Don “The Beast Within” Gordon,
Grand L. “Die Hard” Bush, Zohra
Lampert from Let’s Scare Jessica To Death
and Harry Carey Jr. from UFOria as
another ill-fated priest) and marvelous cinematography from one of my
favourites, Gerry Fisher (who shot Wolfen, Malpertuis and many others), this
remains an appealing movie, if deeply flawed! I’m going to give Exorcist III two and a half bathtub
carps!
This movie's reputation has climbed significantly over the years, but I still remember renting it with my friends way back when and we all thought it was absolutely hilarious. Not intentionally, either. The dream sequence was a real kneeslapper.
ReplyDeleteYeah, this is definitely a "tell, don't show" movie. That's justified in a way because it helps hide the identity of the killers, but sometimes I'm irritated by it.
ReplyDeleteBlatty seems to think describing a sadistic murder without showing it is a form of taking the high road.
I don't always agree. You can show something really fast and then cut away, but having a character describe the wounds in great detail actually draws it out.
I think it fits when the killer does it because he's bragging, but I don't like when Lieutenant Kinderman does it. It feels out of place.